Kiln People

Aloha,

On a rainy late summer's eve, the Beamers gathered to celebrate passage through another book, this one a long and twisty road where the journey was more than half of the fun.  "Kiln People" by David Brin is a mystery set in a future America that has nearly unlimited artificial cloning available for everyone, making for a radically different economy and society.  Albert Morris is a "ditective" (puns feature frequently throughout the book), a profession he prefers for being less likely to go obsolete.  With the ability to make "dittos" (artificial people who last 24 hours), he is his own agency, in fact, able to follow up on multiple lines of investigation by himselves.  Wherein lies much of the fun and frustration of the book, as it switches viewpoint among a variety of Alberts, who, having different experiences, also have different understandings of the unfolding solution to the murder of Yosil Maharal, the scientist who perfected the ditto technology.  Brin is able to juggle the different Alberts rather successfully, most Beamers agreed, but at the price of having to repeat some of the material to indicate just which Albert is which in any given scene.  Transitions happen rapidly, with chapters often only 1-3 pages long, especially as the novel reaches its climax.

One point of contention for us was the central mystery in the book.  Some Beamers appreciated it as an organizing point around which the plot could unfold (and a plot that involves industrial espionage, multiple identities/personalities, war as a spectator sport, the quantum nature of consciousness, time travel, and adds in first contact with aliens as a throw-away bit can certainly use some focusing).  First-time Beamer Chris found that the pull of solving the mystery was precisely what he needed to stick with the book as the sf concepts came flying fast and furious.  Jon, on the other hand, disliked the requirement of misdirection that a mystery adds to a story, particularly when the solution deflates expectations, akin to a magic trick losing its luster when it is explained.  The issue of misdirection was another discussion point for us.  I offered the idea that Brin layered concepts to take away the reader's attention to some of the weak points in his world-building (two of which Juliet questioned, like the significance of the loosely attached war-as-reality-TV-show and the problem of job continuity with employees who dissolve between shifts).  By introducing a high-tech mystery involving newer, higher tech trade secrets, Brin keeps us just off-balanced enough not to consider the shaky foundations.  Jon, however, did not buy the argument, seeing enough intellectual interest being generated by the concepts of cloning and personality and ego survival to keep the story afloat without the added "noise" of the murder mystery.  Of course, where he found fascinating the introduction of multiple personality disorder into a cloning hall of mirrors is precisely the point at which Kevin saw the story going over the edge into unbelievability.  And that is before we even hit the cosmic consciousness and time travel sequences.

In general, we agreed that a significant portion of the book could have been trimmed in the editing process, as much as 1/3rd according to Kevin.  Juliet pointed to a passage about how vehicles offered "wrap-around" displays based on a passenger's eye direction that Brin seems to repeat three times with identical wording.  Neat idea, but we probably get it the first time.  Still, the layering of all the different sf concepts produced a setting and a set of interactions that Liz found very original and unlike any of our other sf books, even those with similar concerns for identity transfers.  (The parallels of people moving into new, improved bodies in "Kiln People" and last month's "Old Man's War" by John Scalzi caught the eyes of several Beamers, particularly the scene of girlfriend Clara rescuing the remains of the green-colored ditto Albert/Frankie.)  Original as it is, the book does reference quite a bit of older sf, including many in-jokes and references to previous works.  The sequence of real Albert disguised as a ditto and exposed to harm, which Chris questioned for its necessity to the plot, recalls Walter Miller's "The Darfsteller", an early Hugo Award winner about an actor who sneaks into a robot stage company at the risk of his character being shot in the last act of the play.  The government-supplied income, the "purple wage", is taken from the Philip Jose Farmer Hugo winner, "Riders of the Purple Wage", similarly.  With all that, the book makes free use of its borrowed material and definitely runs its own course with it.  Brin is also very light-hearted with his prose, cramming puns and word play and jokes into every chapter, particularly in the headers.  Whether it helps or hurts the material to have so much comic material in it we did not decide.  But, as Liz pointed out, Brin cautions against making a "perfect" world as it would be one that lacked the ingredients for both tragedy and comedy, which we all agreed would make it less than ideal for Beamer meetings.

Our October book is "Pride and Prejudice and Zombies", the updated version of the Jane Austen classic by Seth Grahame-Smith, now with more bone-crunching zombie mayhem.  For November, we will spiral out into the galaxy with "Federations", John Joseph Adams's collection of imperial space operas.  In December, we will close out the year with the first of Kage Baker's Company novels, "In the Garden of Iden", about time-traveling cyborgs in Tudor England.  After the new year turns, we will be "Beggars in Spain" with Nancy Kress, genetically modified to give up sleep.

- Eugene, retiring into the late summer night ...